AI-powered workflows that save time and surface decision-ready information within your EHR workflows, not outside them. Discover what’s possible.

1167950 AP Care Management Blog PAC Management Hours Back-Image-Final

What Care Managers Could Be Doing Instead of Chasing Charts


For every member in a skilled nursing or long-term care facility, a care manager needs answers to a few urgent questions.

When should the patient ideally leave the SNF, are they going home, and what will they need when they get there? Are they in the right care setting, or could they safely move to a more appropriate, lower-cost setting? And who on my caseload is trending toward the hospital, and why?

Those questions shape the work that follows: the home health referral, the equipment, the medication changes, the follow-up visit, whether the return home holds, and whether the length of stay still aligns with the member’s clinical needs. For long-stay and LTSS members, the setting question may never fully close. The ongoing work is understanding whether the current setting remains appropriate, whether risks are rising, and whether there is a safe path back to the community.

Either way, at most plans those answers arrive secondhand, late, or not at all. An update requested from the facility and returned a day later. A discharge summary that shows up after the member is already home. A risk that becomes visible only as a readmission claim.

The problem isn’t the team. It’s what the team is spending its time on.

That gap is what three in four plan leaders describe when they say their care managers function more as information gatherers than trusted advisors, according to PointClickCare-commissioned research from Sage Growth Partners with more than 150 health plan leaders.

Only 19% of plans say outreach begins with a complete discharge summary, medications, and follow-up plans in hand. Nearly half name care manager time spent on administrative tasks as a top challenge in post-discharge care management, ranking just behind two larger barriers: low member response rates (67%) and fragmented data across systems (51%). The response-rate number matters most, because outreach is not automatic: hours spent piecing together what happened are fewer chances to call, message, and follow up when members are most likely to respond.

The point is simple: the hours are already funded and already being worked. Their value depends on whether they are spent discovering what happened or acting on what is happening now. More interventions alone are not a strategy. That makes the stakes bigger than workflow efficiency. CMS triple-weights the Part C all-cause readmissions measure, and cut points move with the field, so incremental improvement no longer protects position. On the Medicaid side, HEDIS thresholds keep rising while state funding does not. The math is direct: a single readmission costs roughly $17,500, so preventing just one readmission per week approaches $1 million in annual savings.

What actually answers the questions that drive better outcomes

Real-time visibility into skilled nursing and long-term care stays answers those questions earlier, using the facility’s own documentation as the stay progresses rather than a records request after it ends.

“When should they leave, where should they go, and what will they need?”

AI Discharge Planning in PAC Management IQ reads the facility’s documentation as the stay unfolds and surfaces the discharge picture while there is still time to act: estimated discharge date, disposition, home health referrals, DME needs, follow-up appointments, patient instructions, and the PCP. Coordination starts before the stay ends, and length-of-stay decisions can be grounded in the member’s clinical needs rather than delayed updates.

“Is the current setting still the right one?”

That same visibility helps plans evaluate whether a member should remain in the SNF, transition home with supports, or move to another appropriate setting. Length of stay becomes part of the clinical conversation, not just a retrospective utilization review.

“Who’s trending toward the hospital, and why?”

Predictive Return to Hospital (pRTH) scores each member’s likelihood of a hospital admission within seven days and refreshes that view twice daily, across both skilled and long-term custodial stays. The care manager can see not only that risk is rising, but why: the progress-note excerpt behind each risk factor, the note title and date, individual drivers such as falls, skin and wound, infection, or a psychotropic change, a plain-language summary, and 24-hour trends showing what is rising.

Care teams have long been able to see that risk is climbing. Seeing why is what turns a score into a next step. The key questions get answered before the outreach begins, not after.

Where the reclaimed hours go

“Transitions and discharge clarity are where things break down.”

The coordination that happens before discharge day. Home health scheduled, DME ordered, transportation arranged while the member is still in the facility. Medication changes caught during the stay instead of after a return to the hospital. When plan leaders were asked which clinical insight from discharge documentation would be most valuable, 47% ranked medication reconciliation first. Catching a discrepancy while someone is still in the building is a very different intervention than discovering it in the ED.

Low member response rates are a top challenge for 67% of plan leaders.

The barrier conversation. Who’s there with you at home? Can you afford the new prescriptions? How are you getting to Thursday’s appointment? These were always the job. But they require time to reach the member, hear what may get in the way, and solve for the practical barriers that decide whether the discharge plan holds. When care managers get that time back, outreach becomes a chance to keep the transition from unraveling.

“Stop chasing charts. That’s what grabbed me immediately.”

The member who’s trending the wrong way. The score flags who is rising; the note excerpt beside it shows why. A CNA’s note about a fall on the way to the bathroom. Pain trending up. A psychotropic change. The hour goes to the intervention itself: the call to the facility, the plan adjustment, the family conversation, while there is still time to change the outcome.

“Reducing readmissions is the primary criterion.”

The follow-up that lands inside the window. The clock on post-discharge follow-up starts at discharge, not at the claim. When the discharge picture is visible during the stay, appointments get scheduled in days rather than weeks, inside the windows that quality measures and recoveries are both built around. None of this replaces the care manager. The technology does the retrieval. People do the judgment and the relationship. It works when the humans get more human time, not less. This is especially important for plans that have moved care management to a delegated partner. Delegation moves the work, but it does not move the accountability. The measures, member experience, and medical expense still land on the plan, which makes discharge readiness, appropriate setting, length of stay, and rising risk the questions to put to whoever manages your members’ post-acute care.

What this looks like in practice

The clearest evidence comes from risk-bearing provider organizations, which are accountable for the same readmission, length-of-stay, and total-cost outcomes plans watch closely, and which increasingly are the kind of organization plans delegate care management to. Wherever the care managers sit, in-house or with a delegated partner, the same questions about discharge readiness, appropriate setting, and rising risk decide the outcomes.

Tandigm Health, a Philadelphia-based population health management company, changed how its nurses start the day.

“PAC Management gives us real-time visibility into skilled nursing—where our patients are, what’s happening, and who needs attention most. We went from seeing about 50% of our SNF stays to over 95%, which allows us to intervene earlier and support stronger transitions. Our nurses start each day using the AI-driven readmission risk score to prioritize outreach, and we’ve seen a 4% reduction in readmissions even at non-partner facilities.”

Dana Pedrick, Vice President of Care Management, Tandigm Health

Tandigm recorded a 16.7% reduction in readmissions overall and scaled its reach without adding headcount.

Ascension Florida, managing roughly 25,000 MSSP lives across two ACOs, had been tracking post-acute patients through phone calls and secondhand updates.

“Our team starts every day with real-time visibility into SNF patients including readmission risk scores, vitals, and therapy notes, which lets us prioritize outreach and catch issues like med discrepancies before they escalate. Since implementing PAC Management, we’ve seen a 35% drop in readmissions and a 20% reduction in length of stay.”

Kim Lewis, RN, BSN, Director of Care Management, Population Health, Ascension

Ascension Illinois put the capacity gain most plainly: “We can do more with the same amount of people we have.”

Time back is a quality strategy, not just an efficiency project. The question to ask about AI in care management is not what the technology does on its own. It is what your best people can do with the hours it gives back.

See what your care managers could do with the hours back

PAC Management IQ gives health plan and delegated care management teams real-time visibility into skilled nursing and long-term care stays, with the discharge plan surfaced as it forms and readmission risk scored with the clinical reason beside it. Outreach starts from what is happening with the member now, not from a records request.

Explore PAC Management IQ for Health Plans